TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moore v. Howard Mercantile Co.

Moore v. Howard Mercantile Co., 1914 OK 123, 139 P. 524
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 10, 1914
Docket
No. 3396
Judges
Kane
Citations
139 P. 5241914 OK 12340 Okla. 4911914 Okla. LEXIS 64
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Settlement of Case-Made — Necessity for Notice. Where no notice of the time of settlement of a case-made is given or waived, and there is no appearance of the opposite party either in person or by counsel, a case-made so settled is a nullity, and no jurisdiction is vested in this court to decide any question arising thereon. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from. County Court, Ellis County; A. E. Williams, Judge. Action between W. E. Moore and the Howard Mercantile Company. From the judgment, W. F. Moore brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Kane

KANE, J.

The above-entitled cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss upon the ground that said case-made was presented to the trial court for signing and settlement, and the same was signed and settled without notice of the time and place of signing and settlement having been served upon the defendant in error or his counsel, and that said defendant in error was not present in person or by counsel at the time said case-made was settled and signed, and never offered any amendments to said case-made and that said case-made was settled, and signed without any knowledge or notice on the part of the defendant in error of the time and place the same was'to be settled and signed. The motion to dismiss must be sustained. The rule is:

“Where no notice of the time of settlement of a case-made is given or waived, and there is no appearance of the opposite party either in person or by counsel, a case-made so settled is a *492 nullity and no jurisdiction is vested in this court to decide any question arising thereon.”

Ft. S. & W. R. Co. v. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee, 25 Okla. 128 , 105 Pac. 647 ;

First Nat. Bank v. Daniels, 26 Okla. 383 , 108 Pac. 748 ;

Lister v. Williams, 28 Okla. 302 , 114 Pac. 255 ;

Harrison v. Penny, 28 Okla. 523 , 114 Pac. 734 . Upon the authority of the foregoing cases, the appeal is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 13 cases

View all citing references →
1914: 21915: 61916: 31917: 11923: 119142026peak 1915 · 6

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. Going1915 OK 522, 150 P. 488
  2. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris1923 OK 20, 211 P. 1044
  3. State v. Coyle1915 OK CR 72, 150 P. 80
  4. Tracy v. Dennis1915 OK 4, 145 P. 772
  5. Hubbard v. Meek160 P. 1128 (Okla. 1916)
  6. Foral v. Bogle1915 OK 25, 146 P. 706

Most recent

  1. Ranney-Davis Mercantile Co. v. Morris1923 OK 20, 211 P. 1044
  2. Keenan v. Chastain1917 OK 266, 164 P. 1145
  3. Hubbard v. Meek160 P. 1128 (Okla. 1916)
  4. Crow v. Fairchild159 P. 357 (Okla. 1916)
  5. Howard v. Arkansaw1916 OK 703, 158 P. 437
  6. State v. Coyle1915 OK CR 72, 150 P. 80

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
First Nat. Bank of Collinsville v. Daniels, 1910 OK 131, 108 P. 748 29
Ft. Smith & W. R. v. State Nat. Bank of Shawnee, 1909 OK 273, 105 P. 647 15
Harrison v. Penny, 1911 OK 92, 114 P. 734 11
Lister v. Williams, 1911 OK 38, 114 P. 255 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list