TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rhodes v. State

George Rhodes v. State.

Rhodes v. State, 1917 OK CR 21, 162 P. 230
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 17, 1917
Docket
No. A-2763.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
162 P. 2301917 OK CR 2113 Okla. Crim. 861917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 20
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Time for Perfecting. An appeal from a conviction in a misdemeanor case will be dismissed where noit taken within 60 dasys after judgment, and the" case-made shows no extension of time.
Summary
Appeal from County Court, Okmulgee County.; Mark L. Bozarth, Judge. George Rhodes was convicted of violating the prohibitory law,, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, George Rhodes, was convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county on a charge of unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors. On the 15th day of February, 1916, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 60 days and to pay a fine of $100 costs. From the judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken' by filing in this *87 court on June 14, 1916, a petition in error with case-made. The state has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the same was not taken within the statutory 60 days. No order of the court or judge extending the time to appeal has been made. No answer or response to the motion to dismiss has been filed, and a careful examination of the case-made fails- to disclose that the trial court or judge made any order extending the time within which to' perfect the appeal.

It follows that the motion to dismiss must be sustained. The purported appeal is therefore dismissed, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to enforce its judgment therein.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1919: 11920: 11923: 119192026peak 1919 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Wilson v. State1923 OK CR 234, 217 P. 1057
  2. Rhine v. State1920 OK CR 199, 193 P. 52
  3. Holly v. State181 P. 518 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)

Most recent

  1. Wilson v. State1923 OK CR 234, 217 P. 1057
  2. Rhine v. State1920 OK CR 199, 193 P. 52
  3. Holly v. State181 P. 518 (Okla. Crim. App. 1919)

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list