TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Osage Oil & Refining Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co.

OSAGE OIL & REFINING CO. Et Al. v. INTERSTATE PIPE CO.

Osage Oil & Ref. Co. v. Interstate Pipe Co., 1925 OK 718, 239 P. 581
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 15, 1925
Docket
No. 16079
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
239 P. 5811925 OK 718113 Okla. 1141925 Okla. LEXIS 910

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal, for the reason no notice was given of intention to appeal. An examination of the record shows that no notice was given. Section 782, C. O.S. 1921, is- mandatory, and the appeal is dismissed. Nichols v. Lonsdale, 109 Okla. 59 , 234 Pac. 752 ; Atkins v. Lynholm, 87 Okla. 123 , 209 Pac. 319 ; Miller v. Brownfield, 73 Okla. 156 , 175 Pac. 211 ; Crawford v. Shintaffer, 92 Okla. 22 , 217 Pac. 867 ; Holbert v. Patrick, 72 Okla. 25 , 177 Pac. 566 .

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 5

DepthCaseCited by
Crawford v. Shintaffer, 1923 OK 521, 217 P. 867 12
Holbert v. Patrick, 1918 OK 163, 177 P. 566 8
Atkins v. Lynholm, 1922 OK 202, 209 P. 319 4
Miller v. Brownfield, 1918 OK 542, 175 P. 211 4
Nichols v. Lonsdale, 1925 OK 239, 234 P. 753 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list