Davis v. Vaughn
DAVIS Et Al. v. VAUGHN Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
RITTENHOUSE, O.
The petition in error and the transcript of the record in the ease was filed in this court on September 30, 1912, Neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.
The petition in error should therefore be dismissed for want of prosecution, under rule 7 of this court ( 38 Okla. vi , 137 Pac. ix ).
Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250 , 140 Pac. 1155 .
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.