TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Dykes v. Markham

DYKES v. MARKHAM Et Al.

Dykes v. Markham, 1915 OK 62, 146 P. 434
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
January 26, 1915
Docket
No. 4104
Judges
Moore, Pitchford
Citations
146 P. 4341915 OK 6244 Okla. 6691915 Okla. LEXIS 728
Disposition
Dismissed for failure to file brief.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Briefs—Dismissal. No briefs having been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, nor cause shown for the failure to file at the time the cause is assigned for submission, the appeal will .be treated as abandoned, and accordingly dismissed. (Syllabus hy Moore, C.)
Summary
Error from District Court, Cherokee County; Action by C. D. Markham and another, doing business as the. Tahlequah Lumber Company, against A. H. Dykes, guardian. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Moore

Opinion by MOORE, C.

Petition in error, with transcript attached, was filed in this court on June 20, 1912, complaining of a judgment rendered by the district court of Cherokee coun- *670 and in favor of the defendants in error, for $1,596.20, together with costs of suit, and that the sum of $1,553.54 on deposit with the First National Bank of Tahlequah, Okla., to the credit of A. H. Dykes, guardian, be applied to the payment of such judgment. The cause was assigned for submission on January 18, 1,915. '• • No briefs have been filed by either party as required by rule 7 of the court ( 38 Okla. vi , 137 Pac. ix ), nor cause shown for such failure.

Following the settled practice, the appeal will be deemed to have been abandoned by the1 plaintiff in error, and is accordingly dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1918: 119182026peak 1918 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Bilby v. Roberts1918 OK 147, 171 P. 713

Most recent

  1. Bilby v. Roberts1918 OK 147, 171 P. 713

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list