Barker v. Forrest
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, J.
The appeal in this case was lodged in this court on October 1, 1908, and the case was regularly assigned for trial at the regular January, 1910, term, which began January 11, 1910. Prior to the time that said case was reached on the calendar, to wit, on January 18, 1910, the defendant in error moved that the appeal be dismissed, for the reason that the plaintiff in error had not prepared and served a brief upon the defendant in error, in compliance with rule 7 of this court ( 20 Okla. viii , 95 Pac. vi ). The plaintiff in error having had due service of the filing of said motion, and not having responded thereto, and no brief having been filed in this ease, the motion is accordingly sustained, and the appeal dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.