TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Woods v. Bond

WOODS v. BOND Et Al.

Woods v. Bond, 1911 OK 288, 116 P. 801
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
July 11, 1911
Docket
No. 928
Judges
Turner, Dunn, Kane, Williams
Citations
116 P. 8011911 OK 28829 Okla. 2411911 Okla. LEXIS 281
Disposition
Reversed.
Syllabus
COSTS — Security—Deposit. Where, in a suit in the district court, plaintiff, a resident of the county in which the suit is brought, before the summons issues, deposits with the clerk of the court $16 as security for costs, pursuant to Wilson’s Stats, of Okla. 1903, sec. 4773, he cannot be required to make a further deposit. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from District Court, Pittsburg County; Preslie B. Cole, Judge. Action by John Woods against R. I. Bond and others. From a judgment of dismissal and denial of a motion to reinstate the cause, plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Turner

TURNER, C. J.

On February 13, 1908, John Woods, plaintiff in error, a resident of the county and state, sued R. I. Bond and T. W. Hunter, defendants in error, in the district court of Pittsburg county, and before the summons issued made a cash deposit with the clerk of the court of $15, for costs. On April 12, 1909, he was ordered by the court to deposit additional costs or security therefor within 30 days. Failing to comply with the order, the court, on April 16, 1909, on defendant’s motion, dismissed the cause at plaintiff’s cost, whereupon he excepted, and *242 his motion being overruled to reinstate the cause, he again excepted and brings the same here.

The court erred. Wilson’s Stats. of Okla. 1903, § 4773, was adopted from Kansas. Comp. Laws 1879, c. 80, § 580a. Prior thereto, it was construed in Henry D. Carr, Ex’r, v. Sarah Osterhout, 32 Kan. 277 , 4 Pac. 318 . There the court in the syllabus said:

“Where the plaintiff in a suit in the district court, a resident of the county in which suit is brought, before the issue of a summons, deposits with the clerk of the court the sum of $15 as security for costs, pursuant to section 580a, c. 80, Coihpiled Laws of 1879, neither he nor his legal representatives or successors in interest can be required to make any further deposit, or give any further or other security for costs in that suit in that court.”

The cause is reversed and remanded.

DUNN, .HAYES, and KANE, JJ, concur; WILLIAMS, J., not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Carr v. Osterhout, 32 Kan. 277 (1884) 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list