First Nat. Bank of Hobart v. Spink
First Nat. Bank of Hobart v. Spink Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Williams, C. J.
On the 30th day of July, A. D. 1906, before the Hon. F. E. Gillette, judge of the district court for Caddo *469 and Kiowa counties, in chambers, in the city of Anadarko, after due notice motion was presented to have the herein garnishment dissolved, and the garnishees discharged. After hearing said motion, same was sustained, the garnishment dissolved, and the garnishee discharged. Thereupon plaintiff prayed an appeal to the Supreme Court of the territory, and same was allowed, at the same time 30 days being allowed plaintiff to make and serve a case-made, and 10 days to suggest amendments, to be settled upon 5 dajrs’ notice by either party. Pending appeal, execution was to be stayed, upon plaintiff giving supersedeas bond in the sum of $100.
The petition in error was not filed with the clerk of said Supreme Court until the 1st day of December, 3906, over four months after the entering of said order appealed from. Said petition in error not having been filed with the clerk of said court, of which this court is, by the terms of the enabling act (Act June 16, 1906, c. 3335, § 13, 34 Stat. 275 [TJ. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 150]), the successor, within 30 days from the discharge or dissolution of said garnishment, this court is without jurisdiction to review the action of the judge in chambers, in dissolving the same. Section 4759, Wilson’s Rev. & Ann. St. 1903;
Herring et al. v. Wiggins, Treasurer, 7 Okla. 313 , 54 Pac. 483 .
The appeal is dismissed, at the cost of the plaintiff in error.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 15 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.