TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Gordon v. State

John Gordon v. State.

Gordon v. State, 1915 OK CR 210, 152 P. 142
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
October 23, 1915
Docket
No. A-2276.
Judges
Doyle, Furman, Armstrong
Citations
152 P. 1421915 OK CR 21012 Okla. Crim. 1031915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 208
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Syllabus
APPEAL — Dismissal. In felony cases the appeal must be taken within six months after the judgment is rendered. Section 5991, Eev. Laws. In such cases the appeal is taken by filing in this court a petition in error with case-made attached, or transcript of the record, together with proof of service of notices of appeal as required by statute, and when this is not done within the time prescribed by the statute, this court docs not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal, and such an appeal will be dismissed.
Summary
Appeal from District Court, LeFlore County; W. H. Brown, Judge. John Gordon was convicted of murder and appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Doyle

DOYLE, P. J.

Under an indictment preferred by the grand jury of LeFlore county, wherein the plaintiff in error, John Gordon and Sam Gordon were jointly charged with the murder of one Lewis Johnson, in said county on or about the 22nd day of October, 1912, the plaintiff in error was upon his separate trial convicted of murder and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for life. Judgment and sentence in .pursuance of the verdict was rendered on the 26th day of November, 1913. From the judgment an appeal was attempted to be taken by filing-in this court on Wednesday, May 27, 1914, a petition in error with case-made.

The attorney general has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based upon the fact that said appeal was not taken within six months from the date on which the judgment was rendered.

*104 Section 5991 Rev. Laws provides:

“In felony cases the appeal must be taken within six months after the judgment is rendered.”

Section 5341 Rev. Laws provides:

“The time within which an act is to be done shall be computed by excluding the first day, and including the last; if the last day be Sunday, it shall be excluded.”

Section 2942 Rev. Laws provides: , “The word 'year’ means a calendar year, and 'month/ a calendar month. Fractions of a year are to be computed by the number of months, thus; half a year is six months. Fractions of a day are to be disregarded in computations which include more than one day, and involve no question of priority.”

In the case of Barks v. The State, 11th Okla. Cr. 466, 147 Pac. 1055 , it is said:

“An appeal from a judgment of conviction in a felony case is taken by filing in this court a petition in error with cade-made, or transcript of the record, attached, together with proof of service of the notices of appeal as required by statute (Section 5992, Rev. Laws). When this is not done within the time allowed by statute (Section 5991, Rev. Laws), this court does not acquire jurisdiction of the appeal.”

In this case it appears from the record that the petition in error and case-made was not filed with the clerk of this court within six months after the judgment was rendered. It was one day too late. It follows that the motion to dismiss’ the appeal should be sustained.

We may remark, however, that an examination of the record discloses that the sole assignment of error relied upon for reversal is without merit.

It also appears that the homicide charged was one of four or five the immediate results of a sanguinary melee, occurring at a negro festival held in a church at a place called Cedars.

The motion to dismiss will be sustained, and it is ordered that the purported appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

FURMAN and ARMSTRONG, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 11923: 11972: 11975: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Jones v. State1972 OK CR 172, 499 P.2d 482
  2. Quick v. City of Tulsa1975 OK CR 220, 542 P.2d 961
  3. Smith v. State1921 OK CR 215, 201 P. 661
  4. Dodson v. State1923 OK CR 240, 217 P. 899

Most recent

  1. Quick v. City of Tulsa1975 OK CR 220, 542 P.2d 961
  2. Jones v. State1972 OK CR 172, 499 P.2d 482
  3. Dodson v. State1923 OK CR 240, 217 P. 899
  4. Smith v. State1921 OK CR 215, 201 P. 661

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Barks v. State, 1915 OK CR 37, 147 P. 1055 2

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list