TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

State v. Lilley

State v. Lilley, 1919 OK 311, 184 P. 946
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
October 28, 1919
Docket
No. 10903
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
184 P. 9461919 OK 31176 Okla. 2291919 Okla. LEXIS 167
Disposition
Action dismissed.
Syllabus
(Syllabus by the Court.) Habeas Corpus — When Release Granted. Where the petitioner for writ of habeas corpus complies with the order made by the lower court, for the violation of which he was imprisoned, the action in this court will be dismissed.
Summary
Original action by W. E. Lambert for writ of habeas corpus.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

It having been made to appear that petitioner, W. E. Lambert, has complied with the order of the court, for violation of which he was imprisoned, a determination of the questions presented by his petition for writ of habeas corpus would serve no useful purpose.

The action is therefore dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1981: 119812026peak 1981 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Young v. First State Bank, Watonga1981 OK 53, 628 P.2d 707

Most recent

  1. Young v. First State Bank, Watonga1981 OK 53, 628 P.2d 707

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list