TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Rugg v. Layton

Rugg v. Layton, Co. Supt.

Rugg v. Layton, 1923 OK 647, 218 P. 660
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 18, 1923
Docket
No. 14279
Judges
Stephenson
Citations
218 P. 6601923 OK 64792 Okla. 2621923 Okla. LEXIS 857

Opinion of the Court — Stephenson

Opinion by STEPHENSON, C.

The plaintiffs commenced their original action in this court for a writ of certiorari to the county superintendent of Canadian county, to send up the record and proceedings had before the county superintendent in the matter of changing the boundary of a school district. This cause was regularly submitted. The plaintiff has failed to file his brief as required by the rule of this court. Where the plaintiff, or plaintiff in error, fails to prepare, serve, and file brief, as required by the rules of this court, after a cause has been set down for hearing, and fails to request an extension of time for so doing, the cause will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Therefore, it is recommended that this cause be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2015: 120152026peak 2015 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITY2015 OK 51, 353 P.3d 532

Most recent

  1. DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITY2015 OK 51, 353 P.3d 532

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list