TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Keokuk Falls Improvement Co. v. Beale

The Keokuk Falls Improvement Co. Et Al. v. Ed. J. Beale

Keokuk Falls Improvement Co. v. Beale, 47 P. 481 (Okla. 1896)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 4, 1896
Judges
Dale, Scott
Citations
47 P. 4814 Okla. 712
Summary
Error from the District Court of Pottawatomie County.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Dale

The opinion of the court was delivered by Dale, C. J.:

This is an appeal from a judgment for costs rendered in the district .court of Pottawatomie county in favor of Ed J. Beale against the Keokuk Palls Improvement Co., W. S. Pield, Perry Rodkey and A. C. Crum, in the sum of $105.68. The judgment was based upon § 81 of ch. 70, p. 828 Laws of. Oklahoma, 1890, and from the record it appears that such judgment was rendered in the district court of Pottawatomie county on the 16th day of December, 1893, and that the appeal in this case was filed in this court on July 1, 1895. The appeal having been filed more than one year after the date of the judgment in the court below, the same can *713 not be considered in this court, for the reason that this court has no jurisdiction to consider such appeal if not filed within one year from the date of the judgment or the order sought to be reviewed in this court. (Section 574, cli. 66, p. 858, Laws of Oklahoma 1893.) The appeal is dismissed and the judgment of the lower court affirmed.

Scott, J., having presided at the trial of the cause below not sitting^ all the other Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1897: 11909: 21911: 11916: 118972026peak 1909 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Howard v. Arkansaw1916 OK 703, 158 P. 437
  2. Kilgore v. Yarnell1909 OK 179, 103 P. 698
  3. Tishomingo Electric Light & Power Co. v. Harris1911 OK 58, 113 P. 713
  4. Tennison v. Engle1909 OK 131, 101 P. 1132
  5. Watson v. Mayberry49 P. 479 (Utah 1897) · Dissent

Most recent

  1. Howard v. Arkansaw1916 OK 703, 158 P. 437
  2. Tishomingo Electric Light & Power Co. v. Harris1911 OK 58, 113 P. 713
  3. Kilgore v. Yarnell1909 OK 179, 103 P. 698
  4. Tennison v. Engle1909 OK 131, 101 P. 1132
  5. Watson v. Mayberry49 P. 479 (Utah 1897) · Dissent

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list