Coleman v. State
Lindsey Coleman v. State.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error, Lindsey Coleman, was convicted in the county court of Tulsa county on a charge that he did have in his possession 11 ■ half pints of whisky with intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $200.
No brief had’ been filed, and no appearance made for the plaintiff in error when the case was called for final submission. Whereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment, for failure to prosecute the appeal. Fo<r this reason the judgment is affirmed, and is remanded to the trial court with direction to enforce its judgment.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.