TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Merchants Southwest Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. Johnston

Merchants Southwest Fireproof Warehouse Co. v. Johnston, 1925 OK 782, 239 P. 1116
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 29, 1925
Docket
No. 16727
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
239 P. 11161925 OK 782113 Okla. 1461925 Okla. LEXIS 926

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This case is appealed by transe,ript from the district court of Oklahoma county. This is an action to foreclose a chattel mortgage. There appears in the record the following recital copied from the clerk's minutes:

“At this time this case was called and jury all present and further hearing -resumed; both sides rest and 'defendant demurs to entire evidence of plaintiff and moves the court to direct verdict for defendant ; plaintiff moves to dismiss cause of action and amendment thereto without prejudice, to which the defendant objects and motion to 'dismiss sustained; exceptions allowed. Demurrer of defendant and motion for directed verdict overruled; defendant excepts; defendant moves to dismiss its cross-petition without prejudice; motion sustained; plaintiff moves for judgment on his amended petition for foreclosure of chattel mortgage to satisfy judgment in cause No. 43732; defendant objects; motion sustained and judgment rendered as per J. E. to which defendant excepts and gives notice of appeal and cleric is directed to enter same oin trial docket.

”

This recital 'does not constitute a judgment, and there being no judgment of the trial court in the record, this court has no *147 jurisdiction to review the case on appeal. Schuck v. Moore, 48 Okla. 533 , 150 Pac. 461 ; Negin v. Picher Lumber Co., 77 Okla. 285 , 186 Pac. 205 ; Lillard v. Meisberger, 113 Okla. 228 , 240 Pac. 1067 .

The appeal is dismissed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1928: 21929: 21930: 11931: 11952: 119282026peak 1928 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Long v. McMahan1952 OK 35, 241 P.2d 185
  2. Harris v. Smith1931 OK 341, 300 P. 392
  3. News-Dispatch Printing & Audit Co. v. Board of Com'rs1928 OK 427, 270 P. 2
  4. Dusbabek v. Bowers1928 OK 449, 270 P. 3
  5. Anderson v. Stevenson1929 OK 202, 277 P. 922
  6. Michaels v. Michaels1929 OK 81, 276 P. 737

Most recent

  1. Long v. McMahan1952 OK 35, 241 P.2d 185
  2. Harris v. Smith1931 OK 341, 300 P. 392
  3. Lester v. J. J. Gwin Co.1930 OK 137, 286 P. 339
  4. Anderson v. Stevenson1929 OK 202, 277 P. 922
  5. Michaels v. Michaels1929 OK 81, 276 P. 737
  6. Dusbabek v. Bowers1928 OK 449, 270 P. 3

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Lillard v. Meisberger, 1925 OK 633, 240 P. 1067 52
Schuck v. Moore, 1915 OK 519, 150 P. 461 10
Negin v. Picher Lumber Co., 1920 OK 107, 188 P. 99 8
Rogers v. Bomer, 1920 OK 103, 186 P. 205 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list