TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Potts v. State

John Potts v. State.

Potts v. State, 1911 OK CR 512, 118 P. 1113
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 24, 1911
Docket
No. A-787.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
118 P. 11131911 OK CR 5126 Okla. Crim. 6871911 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 499
Disposition
Reversed and remanded.
Summary
Appeal from Kiowa County Court; J. W. Mansell, Judge. John Potts was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Kiowa county at the January, 1910, term, upon a charge of transporting whisky from the south side of Main street in the town of Manitou, Tillman county, Oklahoma, to the north side of said street in said town in Kiowa county, Oklahoma. A number of errors are complained of in the petition in error and brief; among others, error of the trial court in giving the following instruction:

"The defendant is always presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established by competent testimony beyond a reasonable doubt, and unless the evidence in this case does -this, you will find the defendant 'not guilty,' but under the plea of the defendant in this cause, it will be the duty of the defendant to' show to your satisfaction that the whisky was an interstate shipment, and that he was conveying the same to his own home, after having reecived the same from the interstate shipper.'' The testimony tends to show that plaintiff in error was a farmer living near- Manitou; that he had bought a shipment of fruit trees from a nursery at McKinney, Tex.; that he had gone to town for the purpose of receiving the fruit trees and when they were unpacked three pints of whisky were found in a package in the shipment with the words "Presented to John Potts'', written thereon. He took the whisky and the trees, and had not arrived at home when arrested. The instruction of the court, supra, based upon this record, is prejudicial error. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to the trial court to grant a new trial.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list