TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Chandler v. State

On Petition for Rehearing.

Chandler v. State, 105 P. 375 (Okla. Crim. App. 1910)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 22, 1910
Docket
No. A-113.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
105 P. 3753 Okla. Crim. 264

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

The decision of the court in this case was filed on December 7, 1909. On December 14, 1909, plaintiff in error by his counsel filed a petition for rehearing.

After careful consideration of the petition, and oral argument and brief of counsel for plaintiff in error, we are of the opinion that there is no merit in the petition, and that the decision heretofore rendered in this case should not be vacated or modified. The petition for rehearing raises no questions that were not submitted and passed on in the original opinion, and there is no contention made that the decision is in conflict with an express statute or controlling decision.

The petition for rehearing is therefore denied. *Page 265

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 18 cases

View all citing references →
1912: 11917: 21920: 11922: 11929: 11930: 31938: 11948: 11950: 11952: 11954: 11957: 11962: 11964: 11975: 119122026peak 1930 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Young v. State1962 OK CR 70, 373 P.2d 273
  2. State v. Baker48 S.E.2d 61 (N.C. 1948)
  3. Tudor v. State1917 OK CR 178, 167 P. 341
  4. Rollen v. State1912 OK CR 231, 125 P. 1087
  5. Reddell v. State1975 OK CR 229, 543 P.2d 574
  6. Moore v. State1950 OK CR 20, 214 P.2d 966

Most recent

  1. Reddell v. State1975 OK CR 229, 543 P.2d 574
  2. Boring v. State1964 OK CR 85, 395 P.2d 344
  3. Young v. State1962 OK CR 70, 373 P.2d 273
  4. Sheppard v. State1957 OK CR 8, 306 P.2d 346
  5. Lippoldt v. State1954 OK CR 67, 271 P.2d 745
  6. Wallace v. State1952 OK CR 152, 250 P.2d 484

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list