TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Hicks v. State

Pearl Hicks v. State. (Two Cases.)

Hicks v. State, 1923 OK CR 153, 215 P. 794
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
June 14, 1923
Docket
Nos. A-4657, A-4644.
Judges
Doyle, Matson, Bessey
Citations
215 P. 7941923 OK CR 15324 Okla. Crim. 431923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 237

Opinion of the Court — Doyle

DOYLE, J.

In the information in this case Pearl Hicks was charged with obtaining from- one Geo. A. Feland a promissory note for $200, executed by said Pearl Hicks and one A. L. Hicks, by giving said Feland a check in payment of said note. Upon his trial the jury found him guilty and assessed his punishment at imprisonment in the penitentitary for the term of four years. On October 18, 1922, the court rendered judgment on the verdict. An appeal was taken by filing in this court on April 17, 1923, a' petition in error with case-made.

In the information in the other case Pearl Hicks was charged with removing three mares from Beckham county with intent to defraud one Geo. A. Feland, mortgagee and holder of a chattel mortgage executed on said personal property, executed by Pearl Hicks in favor of the said Geo. A. Feland. Upon his trial he was found guilty, but the jury failed to agree as to his punishment. On October 25,1922, the court rendered judgment on the verdict and sentenced the defendant to imprison *44 ment in the penitentiary for the term of one year. From the judgment an appeal was taken by filing in this court on April 23, 1923, a petition in error with case-made.

Pending the determination of said appeals, counsel of record for plaintiff in error filed motions to dismiss these appeals, for the reason that on the 11th day of June, 1923, paroles were granted the plaintiff in error in each of the above entitled and numbered causes by the Governor, and the same were accepted by plaintiff in error.

Where a plaintiff in error accepts a parole pending the determination of his appeal, he thereby waives the right to have his appeal determined, and when notice of this fact is brought to the attention of this court, the appeal will be dismissed. It is therefore adjudged and ordered that the appeals of plaintiff in error, Pearl Hicks, in these two cases be and the same are hereby dismissed, and the causes remanded to the district court of Beckham county.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1940: 119402026peak 1940 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Nicholson v. State1940 OK CR 41, 100 P.2d 896

Most recent

  1. Nicholson v. State1940 OK CR 41, 100 P.2d 896

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list