TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Jeffries v. State

Alex Jeffries v. State.

Jeffries v. State, 1915 OK CR 26, 146 P. 1086
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
March 20, 1915
Docket
No. A-2225.
Judges
Doyle, Furman, Armstrong
Citations
146 P. 10861915 OK CR 2611 Okla. Crim. 4111915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
Disposition
Order that proceedings abate.
Syllabus
APPEAL — Abatement—Beath. In a criminal action, the purpose of the proceeding being to punish the defendant in person, the action must necessarily abate upon his death; and, where -it is made to appear to this court that -a plaintiff in error has died, pending the determination of his appeal, the cause will be abated. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Appeal from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. Alex Jeffries, convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Doyle

DOYLE, P. J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and his punishment assessed at fifteen years in the penitentiary. On the 8th day of September, 1913, he was duly sentenced, and was placed in the penitentiary to undergo said punishment. This is the second appeal in this case. See Jeffries v. State, 9 Okla. Cr. 573 , 132 Pac. 823 .

Since the appeal was taken, and before the final submission of the cause, suggestion of the death of plaintiff in error has been made, and the same called to the attention of the court by the Attorney General.

In a criminal action, the purpose of the proceedings being to punish the defendant in person, the action must necessarily abate upon his death.

Yota v. State, 10 Okla. Cr. 26 , 133 Pac. 257 ;

High v. State, post, 146 Pac. 1197 .

*412 It is therefore adjudged and ordered that all proceedings in this prosecution be abated. The record is remanded, with direction to the district court of Garvin county to enter its appropriate order to that effect.

FURMAN and ARMSTRONG, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 3

DepthCaseCited by
Jeffries v. State, 1913 OK CR 146, 132 P. 823 29
Yota v. State, 1913 OK CR 249, 133 P. 257 5
High v. State, 1915 OK CR 86, 146 P. 1197 1

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list