Threadgill v. City of Coalgate
THREADGILL Et Al. v. CITY OF COALGATE Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by WATTS, C.
This case comes from the district court of Coal county, where a demurrer was sustained to plaintiffs’ petition on March 31, 1913. Plaintiffs declined to plead further, judgment went for defendants on pleadings, and plaintiffs appeal, assigning: “The court erred in sustaining the demurrer of defendants to the petition.”
The certificate to the transcript of the record is not signed by the clerk of the court, neither is the seal thereof attached, and there is therefore nothing before us for decision.
“The Supreme Court will not review errors assigned upon the record in the absence of a certificate of the clerk *682 showing that the same is a full, true, and correct transcript of the record.”
(Hughes v. Martin, 43 Okla. 710 , 144 Pac. 356 .)
We therefore recommend that the attempted appeal be dismissed. ' > By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.