TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Moore v. State

Leslie Moore v. State.

Moore v. State, 1921 OK CR 89, 197 P. 1064
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 26, 1921
Docket
No. A-3678.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
197 P. 10641921 OK CR 8919 Okla. Crim. 1001921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 19

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession 13 pints of whis-ky with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be eon- *101 fined in the county jail for 30 days and pay a fine of $100. He appeals from the judgment.

The evidence shows that the defendant was manager of the Tishomingo Motor Company. The officers raided his place of business and found 13 pints of whisky in a hand bag upon an overhead platform in the rear of the office; that for more than a year the defendant boarded at the Smith Hotel, occupying room 15 on the third floor. The officers went to the room and found in the defendant’s trunk 60 pints of whisky of the same brand as that found at the garage.

As a witness in his own behalf the defendant Leslie Moore testified:

“That was not my whisky. I did not give any one permission to put it in the garage. The whisky found in my room at the Smith Hotel was not my whisky. I did not give anyone permission to put it there. I did not keep my trunk locked. I told the sheriff I would like for him to leave that trunk, as it was one my mother gave me, and I got some old suit cases, and he put the whisky in them. Four days before the seizure I left and went with my father to Marfa, Tex., and left my brother, J. C. Moore, to look after my business. I was only gone two days. I left Marfa, Tex., in the evening the day I arrived there. My brother told me it was his whisky. I asked him if he had been selling it around, and he would not say. He brought it straight through from Kansas City when he was returning with cars. ’ ’

Various errors are assigned and urged. However, after a careful examination of the record, we reach the conclusion that the defendant had a fair trial and was properly convicted.

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1921: 119212026peak 1921 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Gentry v. State1921 OK CR 208, 201 P. 530

Most recent

  1. Gentry v. State1921 OK CR 208, 201 P. 530

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list