TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Upton v. American Trust Co. of Purcell

Upton v. Am. Trust Co. of Purcell, 1912 OK 233, 122 P. 159
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 12, 1912
Docket
No. 2150
Judges
Piayes
Citations
122 P. 1591912 OK 23331 Okla. 4561912 Okla. LEXIS 74
Disposition
Dismissed.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND EEBOE — Case-Ma.de—Settlement. A case-made must, be signed and settled by the judge who tried the cause. The certificate of the clerk that the case-made is correct will not da ■ away with the necessity of such authentication. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from Superior Court, Pottawatomie County; George C. Abernathy, Judge. Action between Alexander Upton and the American Trust Company of Purcell. From the judgment, Upton brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Piayes

PIAYES, J.

This appeal is attempted to be prosecuted by-petition in error and case-made. The purported case-made contains a certificate of the clerk certifying that it is correct; but it fails to show that it was ever settled or signed by the judge by vldiom the cause was tried. Section 6074, Comp. Laws 1909, provides : • “The case and amendments shall be submitted to the judge who shall settle and sign the same, and cause it to be attested by the clerk, and the seal of the court to be thereto attached. It shall then be filed with the papers in the case.”

The foregoing statute requires that the judge settle and sign the case-made.

Oligschlager v. Grell, 13 Okla. 632 , 75 Pac. 1131 . If the case-made has not been settled and signed by the judge, the certificate óf the clerk is insufficient to constitute a valid case-made.

United States ex rel. v. C. O. & G. R. R. Co., 3 Okla. 404 , 41 Pac. 729 ;

Allen v. Krueger et al., 25 Kan. 75 ;

Couse v. Phelps, 11 Kan. 456 . It follows that the purported case-made filed in this proceeding is void, and nothing is presented by it to the court for review, and the cause is dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1912: 11915: 11920: 21921: 11923: 11927: 21965: 119122026peak 1920 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Brown v. Marks1915 OK 111, 146 P. 707
  2. City of Shawnee v. State Pub. Co.1912 OK 515, 125 P. 462
  3. Hall v. Phoenix Ins. Co.1921 OK 229, 198 P. 998
  4. Lyde v. State1920 OK CR 34, 187 P. 252
  5. Shepherd v. Herndon1965 OK 6, 398 P.2d 511
  6. State ex rel. Freeling v. Brewer1923 OK 888, 219 P. 895

Most recent

  1. Shepherd v. Herndon1965 OK 6, 398 P.2d 511
  2. Abraham v. Roland Oil Co.1927 OK 386, 260 P. 771
  3. Kirk v. Rodesney1927 OK 378, 265 P. 1078
  4. State ex rel. Freeling v. Brewer1923 OK 888, 219 P. 895
  5. Hall v. Phoenix Ins. Co.1921 OK 229, 198 P. 998
  6. Burnett v. Burnett1920 OK 95, 188 P. 342

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
United States, ex rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co., 1895 OK 83, 41 P. 729 37
Oligschlager v. Grell, 1904 OK 38, 75 P. 1131 12
Couse v. Phelps, 11 Kan. 455 (1873) 4
Allen v. Krueger, 25 Kan. 74 (1881) 4

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list