Dulaney v. State
Monk Dulaney v. State.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff in error was convicted on an information charging the selling of intoxicating liquor to one John Johnson. On the 5th day of November, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a term of 90 days and to pay a fine of $50.
No briefs have been filed, and when the case was called for final submission no appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Thereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.
We have examined the record proper, and have discovered no error that will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The motion to affirm is therefore sustained.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.