TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

England Bros. v. Young

England Bros. v. Young Et Al.

England Bros. v. Young, 1909 OK 271, 105 P. 654
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 9, 1909
Docket
No. 216
Judges
Williams
Citations
105 P. 6541909 OK 27125 Okla. 8761910 Okla. LEXIS 354
Disposition
Permission to withdraw case-made for correction.
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Case-Made—Correction. When a case-made or record is filed in the Supreme Court, if any evidence heard on the trial of such, cause is omitted therefrom, such court may on its own motion order, within a reasonable time to be fixed by said court, that such omitted parts under the direction of the trial judge may be Incorporated in the case-made with the same effect as if it had been incorporated at the beginning. •See section 1, art. 4, e. 28, p. 322, Sess. Laws Okla. T. 1905. (a) No appeal may be dismissed by reason of such omission until an opportunity for such correction has been allowed. ('Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from, District Court, Craig County. Action between England Bros, and J. W. Young and others. Erom the judgment, England Bros, bring error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Williams

Williams, J.

It is insisted by the defendants in error that the case-made does not affirmatively show that it contains all the evidence heard by the trial court. Section 1, art. 4, c. 28, p. 322, Sess. Laws, Okla. T. 1905, provides that, when a record or ease-made is filed in the Supreme Court in either' a civil or criminal cause, if any evidence heard on the trial *877 of said cause is omitted therefrom, such court may, on its own motion, order within a reasonable time, to be fixed by said court, that such omitted parts under the direction of the trial judge may be incorporated at the beginning, and that no appeal shall be dismissed by reason of such error until an opportunity for such correction is allowed; and, it appearing that there is some question as to whether or not the record or ease-made affirmatively shows that all the evidence introduced before the trial court is contained therein, it is hereby ordered that the plaintiff in error shall be permitted to withdraw this record or case-made for such correction, and that such correction may be made at any time within 40 days from date hereof upon reasonable notice to the opposite side. The costs of this proceeding, however, up to this date, are to be taxed against the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1910: 11914: 11915: 11932: 11935: 119102026peak 1910 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Emery v. Villines1935 OK 687, 53 P.2d 277
  2. Courtney v. Moore1915 OK 709, 151 P. 1178
  3. Collier v. Gannon1914 OK 6, 137 P. 1179
  4. Seibold v. City of Muskogee1932 OK 110, 8 P.2d 35
  5. Board v. Dill1910 OK 103, 110 P. 1107

Most recent

  1. Emery v. Villines1935 OK 687, 53 P.2d 277
  2. Seibold v. City of Muskogee1932 OK 110, 8 P.2d 35
  3. Courtney v. Moore1915 OK 709, 151 P. 1178
  4. Collier v. Gannon1914 OK 6, 137 P. 1179
  5. Board v. Dill1910 OK 103, 110 P. 1107

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list