England Bros. v. Young
England Bros. v. Young Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.
It is insisted by the defendants in error that the case-made does not affirmatively show that it contains all the evidence heard by the trial court. Section 1, art. 4, c. 28, p. 322, Sess. Laws, Okla. T. 1905, provides that, when a record or ease-made is filed in the Supreme Court in either' a civil or criminal cause, if any evidence heard on the trial *877 of said cause is omitted therefrom, such court may, on its own motion, order within a reasonable time, to be fixed by said court, that such omitted parts under the direction of the trial judge may be incorporated at the beginning, and that no appeal shall be dismissed by reason of such error until an opportunity for such correction is allowed; and, it appearing that there is some question as to whether or not the record or ease-made affirmatively shows that all the evidence introduced before the trial court is contained therein, it is hereby ordered that the plaintiff in error shall be permitted to withdraw this record or case-made for such correction, and that such correction may be made at any time within 40 days from date hereof upon reasonable notice to the opposite side. The costs of this proceeding, however, up to this date, are to be taxed against the plaintiff in error.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.