Cox v. Rogers
COX v. ROGERS Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by BREWER, C.
The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on November 12, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosetion.
Hass et al. v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290 , 111 Pac. 543 ;
Maddin v. McCormick et al., 27 Okla. 778 , 117 Pac. 200 ;
McClelland v. Witherall, infra, 119 Pac. 205 ;
Bender v. Bender et al., infra, 119 Pac. 205 .
By the Court: It is so ordered.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 11 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.