Braden v. State
J.H. Braden v. State.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
J. H. Braden was convicted in the county court of Okmulgee county of having sold to one Blaine Hill a pint of whisky on the 17th day of May, 1916.
This transaction took place in the defendant’s place of business in the city of Henryetta, and the evidence on the part of the state by the witness Blaine Hill is to the effect that he bought a pint of whisky from the defendant and paid him $1.25 therefor. The witness Hill is corroborated by one Stormont.
The defendant admitted that the prosecuting witness, Hall, was,at lefendant’s place of business on thei data alleged and tried to buy a pint of whisky from him, but defendant contends that he refused to sell Hill «.ny whisky. Mrs. J. H. Braden testified that she was present at the tíme Hill came to their place of business, and that the defendant refused to sell Hill any whisky.
This presents a plain conflict of evidence. The testimony of the witnesses in behalf of the state clearly supports the conviction. No brief has been filed in behalf of the defendant, and no appearance was made to orally argue the cause at the time the same was submitted. An examination of the entire record fails to disclose any error prejudicial to the substantial rights of the defendant.
The judgment is affirmed.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 0 cases
No case in this database cites this case.