Eureka Pub. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Stigler
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by EDWARDS, C.
On appeal to this court the judgment rendered in the lower court was affirmed. A supersedeas bond had been given staying the execution. A motion has been filed herein for judgment against the sureties on such supersedeas bond. By virtue of the provisions of chapter 249, Sess. Laws 1915, as construed in Long v. Lang, 49 Okla. 342 , 152 Pac. 1078 . the motion is sustained.
Judgment is therefore entered in this court in favor of the First National Bank of Stigler in the sum of 81,172.55, with 10 per cent, interest from January 8,1915, for 822.25 costs taxed in the lower court, and all .costs in this court.
By tbe Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.