Harris v. Grimstead
HARRIS v. GRIMSTEAD Et Al.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion toy STEPHENSON, C.
E. E. Grimstead and Eugene F. Scott, a partnership, engaged in the practice of law, commenced their action against Pat H. Harris, (to recover for legal services rendered for the defendant. The trial of the cause resulted in judgment for the plaintiffs. The defendant has appealed the cause to this court and assigns as error that the verdict and judgment are contrary to the law and the evidence.
It would serve no useful purpose to detail the evidence given in the trial of the cause by the respective parties. It is sufficient to say that there is ample competent evidence 'to support the verdict of the jury in favor of the plaintiffs. Young v. Eaton, 82 Okla. 106 , 198 Pac. 857 .
It is recommended that the judgment, be affirmed.
By ithe Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.