Flynn v. Ponca City Milling Co.
FLYNN v. PONCA CITY MILLING CO. Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
OWEN, J.
This is an appeal from an award made toy the Industrial Commission in favor of the claimant, Frank Flynn.
Flynn claimed to have been injured toy a flour truck striking him in the side, which resulted in the formation of an abscess on the side of his chest.
.The principal question at issue at the hearing was whether this abscess was the result of the accident. Without notice to cither party, a transcript of the testimony was submitted to the medical adviser of the commission, who gave his written opinion to the effect that the abscess probably resulted from the injury. On this opinion the commission based its findings and conclusion. The statement of this physician was not under oath, and neither party to the cause was given an opportunity to interrogate him or offer additional evidence.
The Attorney General has filed a confession of error based on this action of the commission, and a motion asking that the cause be remanded to- the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.
The cases of Englebretson v. Indus. Accident Com., 170 Cal. 793 , 151 Pac. 421 , and Pac. Coast Cas. Co. v.. Pillsbury, 171 Cal. 319 , 153 Pac. 24 , support the confession filed toy the Attorney 'General.
The confession of error and motion to remand will toe sustained. The award will be set aside, and the cause remanded to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.
All the Justices concur, except KANE and RAINEY, JJ., not participating.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.