Todd v. Carter
TODD Et Al. v. CARTER Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
BLEAKMORE, J.
The questions involved herein arise on motion of defendants in error to dismiss this proceeding.
*239 The only assignments of error relied upon by the plaintiffs in error for reversal of the cause are errors alleged to have occurred at the trial.
Motion for new trial being overruled on November 6, 1913, plaintiffs were allowed 90 days within which to make and serve a case-made. Within the time, on January 27th .following, plaintiffs procured an extension of 30 days’ time from January 28, 1914, within which to make and serve said case-made. The case-made was not served until the 29th day of February, 1914, which was after the expiration of the time granted. The case-made is a nullity.
Saxon v. Hardin, 29 Okla. 17 , 118 Pac. 264 .
There being no questions presented by the record which can be considered in this court, the appeal is dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.