TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Lynch v. Garland

Lynch v. Garland, 1912 OK 381, 124 P. 55
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
May 14, 1912
Docket
No. 1504
Judges
Hayes, Turner, Williams, Kane, Dunn
Citations
124 P. 551912 OK 38133 Okla. 1441912 Okla. LEXIS 655
Disposition
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Syllabus
INDIANS — Indian Lands — Allotment. By reason of section 22 of an act of Congress, approved July 1, 1902 (chapter 1375, 32 IT. S. St. at L. p. 716; 1 Kappler’s Indian Affairs, Laws and Treaties, p. 789), the Commissioner' to the Five Civilized Tribes, upon motion made before him, and the Secretary of the Interior, on appeal from an order of said Commissioner, have power at any time before the issuance of patent to art allottee of the Cherokee tribe of Indians, upon notice to such allottee and after hearing, to cancel and set aside a judgment of the Commissioner in a contest awarding to the allottee as contestant the lands allotted to him, when such judgment was procured without service of notice of contest upon the contestee, and without an opportunity given to the contestee to be heard, but upon a false and fraudulent affidavit made by the contestant or one acting for him, showing that such service had been made. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from District Court, Rogers County; T. L. Brown, Judge. Action by Charlotta E. Garland against Elzira Lynch, a minor. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hayes

HAYES, J.

The material facts- in this case are so similar to the.facts in Lynch et al. v. Harris, ante, 124 Pac. 50 , that it presents identically the same question of law that was presented and *145 decided in that case, and it follows upon the authority of that case that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded, with instructions'to enter judgment denying the defendant in error the relief prayed for in his petition filed in the trial court; and it is so ordered.

TURNER, C. J., and WILLIAMS, KANE, and DUNN, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lynch v. Harris, 1912 OK 383, 124 P. 50 3

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list