TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Buffo v. State

D. Buffo v. State.

Buffo v. State, 1910 OK CR 242, 113 P. 233
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
December 22, 1910
Docket
No. A-171.
Judges
Richardson, Fubman, Doyle
Citations
113 P. 2331910 OK CR 2424 Okla. Crim. 5161910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 133
Disposition
Reversed and remanded.
Syllabus
1. APPEAL — Case-Made—Time of Service. Unless the court or judge extends the time for making and serving a case preparatory to an appeal, the defendant in a criminal action has but 30 days in which to serve the same; and in such event, if the case be not served upon the county attorney within 30 days after the rendition of judgment, it will fail as a case-made. 2. INTOXICATING LIQUORS — Unlawful Possession — Information— Sufficiency. An information which alleges that the accused, had in his possession intoxicating liquor, “with the intent to .sell, barter, give away and otherwise furnish, contrary to the form of the statutes,” etc., and which does not charge that the accused intended to sell, barter, give away or otherwise furnish the liquor in possession, is bad on demurrer. ('Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Appeal from Pittsburg Qouniy Court; U. ~W. Higgins, Judge. D. Buffo was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Richardson

RICHARDSON, Judge.

The judgment appealed from herein was rendered on March 17, 1909, on which day plaintiff in error was granted 15 days to file his supersedeas bond and 60 days within which to file his potion in error and case-made in this court. No time for making and serving a case appears to have been requested, and none was allowed by the court. Section 6951 of Snyder’s Conrp. L. grants a defendant in a criminal action 30 days in which to malee and serve a case upon the county attorney, and provides that the court or judge, for good cause shown, may extend the time. The time not having been extended, however, plaintiff in error was required to serve his case upon the county attorney within 30 days from March 17, 1909. His time expired, therefore, on'April 16, 1909. The case was not served until May *517 8, 1909. It therefore fails as a case-macle, and cannot be considered by this court.

The purported case-made, however, contains a transcript of the record duly certified, and assignments of error predicated upon the record proper may be examined. There is but one such assignment, and that is that the court erred in overruling plaintiff in error’s demurrer to the information. The information charged that the accused had in his possession “certain spirituous liquor, to wit, whisky, with the intent then and there to sell, barter,' give away and otherwise furnish, contrary to the form of the statutes in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the state”; and the demurrer was upon the ground that the information did not charge an offense. The demurrer should have been sustained. It is necessary that an indictment, or information allege every essential element of the crime intended to- be charged. This information does not state what the accused intended to sell, barter, give away, and otherwise furnish; and without alleging in some direct and certain manner that he intended to so dispose of the liquor in his' possession, it charged no offense. Beversed and remanded, with directions to set aside the judgment and sustain the demurrer to the information.

FUBMAN, Presiding Judge, and DOYLE, Judge, concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1916: 21925: 31934: 11943: 119162026peak 1925 · 3

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Connard v. State1934 OK CR 98, 35 P.2d 278
  2. Lovett v. State1925 OK CR 446, 239 P. 274
  3. Sturgis v. State1925 OK CR 543, 240 P. 750
  4. Ellison v. State1925 OK CR 468, 239 P. 678
  5. Clasby v. State1943 OK CR 122, 143 P.2d 430
  6. Levy v. State1916 OK CR 62, 158 P. 288

Most recent

  1. Clasby v. State1943 OK CR 122, 143 P.2d 430
  2. Connard v. State1934 OK CR 98, 35 P.2d 278
  3. Sturgis v. State1925 OK CR 543, 240 P. 750
  4. Ellison v. State1925 OK CR 468, 239 P. 678
  5. Lovett v. State1925 OK CR 446, 239 P. 274
  6. Levy v. State1916 OK CR 62, 158 P. 288

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list