Schafer v. State
Charles Schafer v. State. Lewis Green v. State (Two Cases).
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiffs in error in each of the above-entitled causes were informed against, tried, and convicted in the superior court of Logan county for violations, of the prohibition law.
• The trial in each case was had before a jury composed of only six jurors, and the question presented on each appeal is whether a defendant, over his objection, can be lawfully placed upon trial in a superior court for a misdemeanor before a jury of six men. The record shows that in each case, an objection was interposed by defendants and the demand made for trial before a jury of twelve men.
This question has heretofore been passed upon by this court *599 in the case of Tillie Hill v. State, 3 Okla. Cr. 686 , 109 Pac. 291 , wherein it was held that:
“Under the Constitution twelve men constitute a jury in the superior courts in all cases. In civil cases and misdemeanors it requires the concurrence of at least nine jurors to render a verdict, and in felony cases the concurrence of the full twelve.”
The court therefore erred in overruling the demand of plaintiffs in error for a jury of twelve men.
For this reason the judgments pronounced and entered in the above-entitled causes are hereby reversed, and said causes remanded to the superior court of Logan county with direction to grant new trials.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.