TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Evans v. State

R.C. Evans v. State.

Evans v. State, 1916 OK CR 181, 245 P. 912
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
May 1, 1926
Docket
No. A-5427.
Judges
Bessey, Doyle, Edwards
Citations
245 P. 912246 P. 9121916 OK CR 18134 Okla. Crim. 1731926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 170

Opinion of the Court — Bessey

BESSEY, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, R. C. Evans, here designated the defendant, was found guilty of the illegal transportation of whisky, with his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and 60 days in jail.

The testimony discloses that certain peace officers searched the car of the defendant without a search warrant while the car was standing in a public alley in Tulsa. They *174 found 45 pint bottles of whisky in the car. Some of this they found while the car stood in the alley, before the defendant came up, and the major portion they recovered as the defendant was in the act of driving away. The defendant had backed his car and moved about four or five feet when apprehended. The officers did not know whether the whisky was placed in the car at this point or not.

Under the laws of this state a private conveyance may not be searched on suspicion without a search warrant. With a proper search warrant, based upon an affidavit setting forth facts showing probable cause for believing that the car contains liquor, a car may be searched, as a building or rooming house.

In this case the officers’ suspicions were well founded, but that will not justify the unlawful search or purge it of its illegality. The law recognizes that the evils flowing from indiscriminate searches on mere suspicion are greater than the evil of an occasional escape of the guilty, made possible by the rule prohibiting searches and seizures on suspicion only.

For the reasons stated, the judgment of the municipal criminal court of Tulsa is reversed, with instructions to dismiss the cause.

DOYLE and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1941: 21947: 21963: 119412026peak 1941 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. State v. Harris121 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1963)
  2. Edwards v. State1947 OK CR 10, 177 P.2d 143
  3. Evans v. State1941 OK CR 26, 110 P.2d 621
  4. Perry v. State1941 OK CR 79, 114 P.2d 185
  5. Graham v. State1947 OK CR 128, 184 P.2d 984

Most recent

  1. State v. Harris121 N.W.2d 327 (Minn. 1963)
  2. Graham v. State1947 OK CR 128, 184 P.2d 984
  3. Edwards v. State1947 OK CR 10, 177 P.2d 143
  4. Perry v. State1941 OK CR 79, 114 P.2d 185
  5. Evans v. State1941 OK CR 26, 110 P.2d 621

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list