First Nat. Bank of Mill Creek v. Landis
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
KANE, J.
The questions for review in this case are the same as those presented by the record and decided this term in First National Bank of Mill Creek v. Ellis (ante).
In this case, as in that, a demurrer to the petition upon the ground that there was *711 no allegation therein that the defendant bank knowingly received and reserved for' its own use the usurious interest alleged to have been received by it, was overruled. It was held that;
“A petition filed for the purpose of recovering alleged usurious interest by the party contracting for the payment of same should allege that the usurious interest had been paid and that the taking and receiving of the interest was knowingly done, and where these averments are lacking it is error to overrule a general demurrer ■thereto.”
Upon this ground the judgment of the court below is reversed and the cause remanded to the court below for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
DUNN, C. J., and HAYES and TURNER, jj., concur; WILLIAMS, J., not participating.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 6 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.