TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co.

W. L. MOODY & CO. v. FREEMAN-SIPES CO. Et Al.

W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman-Sipes Co., 1911 OK 298, 118 P. 134
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
September 12, 1911
Docket
No. 1461
Judges
Hayes
Citations
118 P. 134118 P. 1351911 OK 29829 Okla. 3901911 Okla. LEXIS 320
Disposition
Dismissed.
Cited by 7
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR — Final Order — Vacating Default Judgment. An order vacating and setting aside a judgment by default, for the purpose of permitting the parties against whom the judgment was rendered to answer and defend, is not a final order, but is interlocutory, from which no appeal lies to the Supreme Court. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from District Court, Garvin County; R. McMillan, Judge. . Action by W. E. Moody & Co. against Ereeman-Sipes Company and W. M. Freeman. From an order vacating a default judgment, plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Hayes

HAYES, J.

Plaintiff in error, who was plaintiff below, has brought this proceeding to have reviewed an order of the trial court, vacating and setting aside a judgment upon default, and permitting defendants in error, defendants below, to hie their answer and defend against the action. Such an order is not a final order, but is interlocutory, from which no appeal lies to this court.

Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Williams et al., 26 Okla. 191, 108 Pac. 1100 ;

Maddle v. Beavers, 24 Okla. 703, 104 Pac. 909 ;

W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & Williams et al., 24 Okla. 701, 104 Pac. 30 ;

Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 24 Okla. 299, 103 Pac. 1038 .

This appeal is therefore dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 7 cases

View all citing references →
1912: 11913: 11914: 11916: 11918: 11920: 11923: 119122026peak 1912 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter1923 OK 59, 233 P. 700
  2. City of Eufaula v. Ahrens159 P. 327 (Okla. 1916)
  3. Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.1914 OK 606, 144 P. 1023
  4. Pierce Coal Co. v. Walker1912 OK 813, 128 P. 493
  5. Gilliam v. Kali-Inla Coal Co.1918 OK 297, 173 P. 69
  6. Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.1920 OK 243, 191 P. 175

Most recent

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. Potter1923 OK 59, 233 P. 700
  2. Vann v. Union Central Life Ins. Co.1920 OK 243, 191 P. 175
  3. Gilliam v. Kali-Inla Coal Co.1918 OK 297, 173 P. 69
  4. City of Eufaula v. Ahrens159 P. 327 (Okla. 1916)
  5. Berger Mfg. v. School Dist. No. 10 of Muskogee Co.1914 OK 606, 144 P. 1023
  6. Rahl v. Marlow State Bank1913 OK 220, 131 P. 525

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 4

DepthCaseCited by
Town of Byars v. Sprouls, 1909 OK 204, 103 P. 1038 16
W. L. Moody & Co. v. Freeman & Williams, 1909 OK 237, 104 P. 30 13
Aetna Bldg. & Loan Ass'n v. Williams, 1910 OK 108, 108 P. 1100 9
Maddle v. Beavers, 1909 OK 226, 104 P. 909 6

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list