TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Wood v. State

Ina Wood v. State.

Wood v. State, 1943 OK CR 22, 134 P.2d 1021
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
February 17, 1943
Docket
No. A-10199.
Judges
Jones, Barefoot, Doyle
Citations
134 P.2d 10211943 OK CR 2276 Okla. Crim. 891943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 77

Opinion of the Court — Jones

JONES, P. J.

The defendant, Ina Wood, was charged by an information filed in the district court of Oklahoma county with criminal syndicalism, was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve ten years imprisonment in the State Penitentiary and to pay a fine of $5,000, and,has appealed.

The information filed against defendant is identical to the information filed against Alan Shaw, which was construed by this court in the case of Shaw v. State, 76 Okla. Cr. 271 , 134 P. 2d 999 , this date decided.

The state’s proof herein is substantially a repetition of the proof offered in the ;Shaw Case. The same books, records, and writings introduced in the Shaw Case were introduced as exhibits and incorporated as a part of the record in the trial of this defendant. It was agreed by counsel for the state and defendant that the same questions of law appeared in the instant case as were dis *95 cussed by this court in the case of Shaw v. State, supra, and that the disposition of Shaw v. State would control in the disposition of this case.

In accordance with this agreement and by reason of the admission as evidence of boohs, pamphlets, and writings without a proper predicate being laid for their admission, and for the failure of the court to submit to the jury the issue as to whether the advocation of the principles purportedly advocated by defendant created a clear and present danger of the commission of unlawful acts to bring about an industrial or political change in our government by such means, the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county must be reversed.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court of Oklahoma county be and the same is hereby reversed and this cause is remanded for further proceedings against the defendant in accordance with the views which we expressed in the case of Shaw v. State, supra.

BAREFOOT, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., absent and not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1945: 11952: 11994: 119452026peak 1945 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Ex Parte Strauch1945 OK CR 31, 157 P.2d 201
  2. Price v. State1994 OK CR 26, 873 P.2d 1049
  3. Young v. State1952 OK CR 25, 241 P.2d 424

Most recent

  1. Price v. State1994 OK CR 26, 873 P.2d 1049
  2. Young v. State1952 OK CR 25, 241 P.2d 424
  3. Ex Parte Strauch1945 OK CR 31, 157 P.2d 201

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Shaw v. State, 1943 OK CR 51, 138 P.2d 136 15

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list