TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Sights v. State

Alva Sights v. State.

Sights v. State, 1922 OK CR 21, 203 P. 484
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
January 26, 1922
Docket
No. A-3792.
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
203 P. 4841922 OK CR 2120 Okla. Crim. 4311922 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 69

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Alva Sights, was convicted in the county court of Custer county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquors, to wit, one fruit jar and one can of alcohol, from a certain place in the city of Clinton, said county, to another place in said city, and on the 17th day of March, 1920, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and pay a fine of $50. From this judgment he appeals.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict is the only question presented.

To support the allegations of the information two witnesses testified that they were with the defendant and drank some of the alcohol, and that they emptied the tin container containing the alcohol into fruit jars. Another witness testified that she saw the defendant take a jar of the alcohol from her home and go to his car; that he still had the alcohol when he got into his ear.

The defendant did not take the witness stand or offer any testimony in the case.

An examination of the record indicates that this appeal is destitute of merit, and, in our opinion, the evidence of the defendant’s guilt was ample to justify the verdict.

The judgment is therefore affirmed. Mandate forthwith.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

2004: 120042026peak 2004 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. S.S. v. State2004 OK CIV APP 33, 90 P.3d 571

Most recent

  1. S.S. v. State2004 OK CIV APP 33, 90 P.3d 571

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list