Moore v. Adams
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This cause comes on to be heard on motion of defendant in error to affirm the judgment of the trial court. There judgment was rendered against plaintiff in error for a certain sum, whereupon he superseded the same and commenced proceeding in error in this court. As counsel for plaintiff in error has not complied with that part of our rule 25
( 38 Okla. x , 95 Pac. viii ) which requires:
“The brief of the plaintiff in error in all cases except felonies shall contain an abstract or abridgment of the transcript, setting forth the material parts of the pleadings, proceedings, facts and documents upon which he relies, together with such other statements from the record as are necessary to a full understanding of the questions presented to this court for decision, so that no examination of the record itself need be made in this court”
—the judgment of the court below is affirmed.
Berry v. Woodward et al., 38 Okla. 468 , 133 Pac. 1127 ;
McKain v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co., 35 Okla. 164 , 128 Pac. 895 ;
Merchants’ & Planters’ Ins. Co. v. Crane et al., 31 Okla. 713 , 123 Pac. 1126 .
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.