TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Caswell v. Eaton

CASWELL Et Al. v. EATON

Caswell v. Eaton, 1914 OK 552, 144 P. 591
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
November 17, 1914
Docket
No. 6846
Judges
PER CURIAM.
Citations
144 P. 5911914 OK 55243 Okla. 7701914 Okla. LEXIS 619
Disposition
Dismissed.
Summary
Error from Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge. Action between J. B. Caswell and another and Ernest Eaton, administrator of the estate of W. M. Eaton. From the judgment, the parties first mentioned bring error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on motion to dismiss. As the record here discloses substantially the same state of facts as case No. 6642, Caswell et al. v. Eaton, Adm'r, ante, what is there said is equally applicable here, and upon the authority of that case this cause is dismissed.

It is so ordered.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1915: 11916: 21919: 11921: 11950: 119152026peak 1916 · 2

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Dill v. Flesher1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191
  2. In re Springer1919 OK 202, 182 P. 713
  3. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rounds-Porter Lbr. Co.1921 OK 9, 195 P. 479
  4. Dawson Schreiner v. Davis Bros. Cheese Company1916 OK 331, 156 P. 204
  5. Storm v. Richart (Waggoner, Interveners)1915 OK 1084, 153 P. 862
  6. Reed v. Arney1950 OK 346, 226 P.2d 418

Most recent

  1. Reed v. Arney1950 OK 346, 226 P.2d 418
  2. Home Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Rounds-Porter Lbr. Co.1921 OK 9, 195 P. 479
  3. In re Springer1919 OK 202, 182 P. 713
  4. Dill v. Flesher1916 OK 437, 156 P. 1191
  5. Dawson Schreiner v. Davis Bros. Cheese Company1916 OK 331, 156 P. 204
  6. Storm v. Richart (Waggoner, Interveners)1915 OK 1084, 153 P. 862

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list