Bank of Taft v. Thompson
BANK OF TAFT v. THOMPSON Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
KANE, J.
This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7
of this court ( 30 Okla. viii , 95 Pac. vi ) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows, that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.
' The motion to dismiss must be sustained.
TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and HAYES, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 2 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.