TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Citizens' Life Ins. Co. v. Owen

Citizens' Life Ins. Co. v. Owen, 1914 OK 105, 139 P. 516
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
March 3, 1914
Docket
No. 3009
Judges
Turner
Citations
139 P. 5161914 OK 10540 Okla. 4461914 Okla. LEXIS 48
Disposition
Reversed.
Syllabus
CORPORATIONS — Foreign. Corporations — ‘ ‘Carrying on Business” — Contracts — Compliance With Statutory Requirements — Former Opinion Followed. The first section of the syllabus in Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co., 23 Okla. 139, 99 Pac. 785, is made the syllabus of this case. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from County Court, Lincoln County; Fred A: Wagoner, Judge. Action by the Citizens’ Life Insurance Company against M. D. Owen. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Turner

TURNER, J.

From a judgment of a justice of the peace, rendered and entered in a suit on two. promissory notes, dated July 23, 1907, payable to one Mason, and by him endorsed to plaintiff, for $80 and $100, respectively, defendant, M. D. Owen, appealed to the county coürt. There judgment was rendered in favor of defendant, to reverse which plaintiff brings the case here. For answer defendant pleaded that plaintiff was a foreign corporation and had not complied with the law in the matter of filing a copy of its charter with the Secretary of State, etc., to which plaintiff replied with a general denial, after its demurrer thereto had been overruled. Both sides then moved for judgment on the pleadings, whereupon the-court overruled plaintiff’s motion and sustained that of defendant and rendered and entered judgment accordingly, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. For the reason that his answer was unverified, it was insufficient to put in issue the execution of the *447 notes and endorsements thereon or the corporate existence of the plaintiff (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 4759), thus leaving alone as a defense-thereto that plaintiff, as a foreign corporation, had failed to comply with the law of this state in the matter of filing a copy of its charter, etc. The demurrer should not only have been sustained to said answer, but the court erred in rendering judgment on the pleadings. If it were true that plaintiff was a foreign corporation, and had not so complied, this fact could not be urged in this case as a defense to the action. Such fact can only be taken advantage of in a direct proceeding by the state.

Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co., 23 Okla. 139 , 99 Pac. 785 . Comp. Laws 1909, sec. 1335 (Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 1355), not being retroactive, has no bearing on this case. The cause is reversed.

All the Justices concur.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Cooper v. Ft. Smith & W. R. Co., 1909 OK 24, 99 P. 785 40

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list