TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Mayberry v. State

Garrison Mayberry v. State.

Mayberry v. State, 1929 OK CR 318, 279 P. 934
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 10, 1929
Docket
No. A-6681.
Judges
Edwards, Chappell, Davenport
Citations
279 P. 9341929 OK CR 31844 Okla. Crim. 1341929 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 36

Opinion of the Court — Edwards

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the district court of Cleveland county of assault with intent to rape, and was sentenced to serve a term of two years in the state penitentiary.

Defendant was charged with an assault with intent to rape a young girl of the age of 6 years. He was at the time 18 years old. The evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. It wholly fails to show an assault with intent to have sexual intercourse. To the contrary, it shows an intent to take indecent liberties with the person.

Instruction No. 9 of the court invades the province of the jury, and is erroneous; but, from the view we take of the entire case, it is unnecessary to discuss it. The record makes out a case of aggravated assault and battery. Under authority of the ease of Lebo v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 116 , 267 Pac. 288 , the judgment is reduced from an assault with intent to rape to an assault and battery, and the judgment fixed at the maximum fine of $100 and 30 days in the county jail.

As so modified, the case is affirmed.

CHAPPELL, J., concurs.

DAVENPORT, J., absent, not participating.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1933: 11934: 11948: 119332026peak 1933 · 1

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Stokes v. State1948 OK CR 6, 190 P.2d 838
  2. Norton v. State1934 OK CR 155, 39 P.2d 162 · Dissent
  3. Harrington v. State1933 OK CR 86, 28 P.2d 596

Most recent

  1. Stokes v. State1948 OK CR 6, 190 P.2d 838
  2. Norton v. State1934 OK CR 155, 39 P.2d 162 · Dissent
  3. Harrington v. State1933 OK CR 86, 28 P.2d 596

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Lebo v. State, 1928 OK CR 180, 267 P. 288 8

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list