McDaniel v. State
M v. McDaniel v. State.
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
M. V. McDaniel, plaintiff in error, was convicted, on an indictment the county court of Craig county, which charged the unlawful sale of one pint of whisky. May 10, 1909, upon arraignment he entered a plea of guilty as charged, and the court appointed May 26th as the time for pronouncing judgment and sentence. At which time the case was continued for sentence and was so continued from term to term until' March 31, 1910, at which time the defendant appeared and filed a. motion to withdraw his plea of guilty heretofore entered and to substitute therefor a plea of not guilty, which motion was by the court overruled, and thereupon the court sentenced the defendant to serve a term of thirty days in the county jail and to pay a fine of two hundred' and fifty dollars and costs. From which judgment the defendant appealed by petition in error with transcript attached. The identical and the only question presented' on this appeal is the same as that in the-case of Jenkins v. State, infra. For the reasons given in the opinion in-that ease the judgment of the county court of Craig county is affirmed-
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.