First State Bank of Warner v. Porter
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
KANE, J.
This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground, among others, that the same was not commenced within the time provided by law. The record shows that the appeal was taken from a judgment rendered on the 12th day of February, 1916, and an order overruling the motion for new tidal therein, which was entered on the first day of April, 1916. No summons in error has been issued or served up to this time. It, therefore, appears that the proceeding in error was not commenced within the time required by chapter IS, Ress. Daws 1910-11, which provides:
“All proceedings for reversing, vacating and modifying judgments or final orders shall be commenced within six months from the rendition of the judgment or final order complained of.”
The proceeding in error, therefore, must be dismissed upon the authority of Shelton v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 79 , 162 PaC. 1092 .
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 5 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.