TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Pickett v. State

J.C. Pickett v. State.

Pickett v. State, 248 P. 352 (Okla. Crim. App. 1926)
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
August 7, 1926
Docket
No. A-5628.
Judges
Edwards, Bessey, Doyle
Citations
248 P. 35235 Okla. Crim. 601926 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 289

Opinion of the Court — Edwards

EDWARDS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Stephens county on a charge of selling whisky, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail. The only contention argued by defendant is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment. On the part of the state, the evidence is that, on the 14th of January, one Noah Johnson and his son went to the residence of defendant and there bought a quart of whisky and gave defendant a check for $3. The evidence is rather vague as to whether the whisky was handed to Johnson by defendant or some boy who brought it into the house, but is definite that the purchase was made as alleged.

The defense is an alibi, and in addition, it was sought by cross-examination to show that the two witnesses for the state were intoxicated and not in a condition to give credible testimony, and, further, that the principal witness had made contradictory statements out *61 of court. It is too well settled to require a citation of authority that where' the evidence, although contradicted, if believed, is such that the jury may logically find a defendant guilty, the weight and credibility of the evidence is peculiarly within the province of the jury, and the verdict of the jury in such case will not be disturbed by this court.

We do not perceive any unusual circumstance here which takes this case out of the usual rule and which would warrant this court in disturbing the verdict on the weight of the evidence.

The case is affirmed.

BESSEY, P. J., and DOYLE, J., concurr.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 52 cases

View all citing references →
1929: 11930: 21931: 31933: 21934: 41935: 91936: 61937: 111938: 51939: 21940: 51941: 11942: 119292026peak 1937 · 11

Relies on it most ⓘ

  1. Spann v. State1940 OK CR 74, 103 P.2d 389
  2. Clemmer v. State1935 OK CR 1, 40 P.2d 37
  3. Houston v. State1937 OK CR 161, 72 P.2d 526
  4. Coppage v. State1937 OK CR 137, 71 P.2d 509
  5. Coats v. State1934 OK CR 68, 32 P.2d 955
  6. Ford v. State1931 OK CR 492, 5 P.2d 170

Most recent

  1. Stevens v. State1942 OK CR 55, 124 P.2d 426
  2. Harvey v. State1941 OK CR 150, 118 P.2d 669
  3. Hicks v. State1940 OK CR 116, 106 P.2d 136
  4. Pooler v. State1940 OK CR 91, 105 P.2d 553
  5. Camp v. State1940 OK CR 86, 104 P.2d 572
  6. Spann v. State1940 OK CR 74, 103 P.2d 389

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list