T. D. Turner & Co. v. Dodson
T. D. Turner & Co. v. Dodson, 1912 OK 149, 121 P. 1087
Syllabus
REVIEW. The syllabus is the same as in McCord-Collins Mercantile Company v. Mary A. Dodson, ante, 121 Pac. 1085.
• (Syllabus by Ames, C.)
Summary
Error from Comanche County Court; James H. Wolverton, Judge.
Replevin by Mary A. Dodson against J. T. Windrow', a constable, for personalty taken by him under execution on a judgment in favor of T. D. Turner & Co. against Frank Dodson, the husband of plaintiff. T. D. Turner & Co. were substituted for Windrow as defendants below. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by AMES, C.
The questions involved in this case are identical with those involved in McCord-Collins Mercantile Company v. Mary A. Dodson, ante, 121 Pac. 1085 , and on the authority of that case this should be affirmed.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.