TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Yandel v. Territory

Wesley Yandel v. Territory

Yandel v. Territory, 1909 OK CR 144, 104 P. 923
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · State Appellate Courts
Decided
November 18, 1909
Docket
No. 2118.
Judges
Cukiam
Citations
104 P. 9231909 OK CR 1443 Okla. Crim. 1881909 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 218
Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Syllabus
1. COURTS — Criminal Court of Appeals — Rules of Practice— 'Power to Make. The power to make reasonable rules for the regulation of the practice before the Criminal Court of Appeals is expressly conferred upon the court by statute. Section 10, art. 2, c. 14, p. 172, Sess. Laws 1909. 2. APPEAL — Review—Dismissal of Appeal — Grounds. A motion to dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution will be sustained, where the record shows there has been a failure by the appellant to comply with the rules and orders of the court in said ■ case. (Syllabus toy the Court.)
Summary
Appeal from District Court, Pottawatomie County; B. F. Bunvell, Judge. Wesley Yandel was convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and he appeals.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Cukiam

PEE CUKIAM.

On the 21st day of March, 1906, the grand jury returned into the district court in and for Pottawatomie county, Okla. T., an indictment against Wesley Yandel and Ben Mitchell, charging them with the crime of murder. The defendants were arraigned and pleas entered, and on March 29, 1906, on application of the defendants, a severance was granted, and the court ordered that the cause proceed to trial against the defendant Wesley Yandel. The trial was begun on said day, and on the *189 31st day of March, 1906, the jury returned into court a verdict against the defendant Wesley Yandel, finding him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree. Motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment were duly filed and overruled by the court and exceptions allowed. Thereupon the defendant was sentenced to serv> a term of eight years in the penitentiary. Time was given to the defendant in which to make and serve' a case-made on his appeal to the Supreme Court, and his bail was fixed at $7,000, which was given. On March 25, 1907, the ease-made and petition in error was filed in the Supreme Court of the territory of Oklahoma. Upon the admission of Oklahoma as a state the case was transferred to the Supreme Court of the state of Oklahoma. Upon the organization of the Criminal Court of Appeals, as directed by statute, the Supreme Court transferred the case to this court, but no record, ease-made, and petition in error have ever been trans-fered to this court. No appearance has ever been made in this court on behalf of the defendant, although said ease has been continued from term to term since the organization of this court.

For this reason, it appearing that the defendant has abandoned his appeal, the appeal is, on the motion of Assistant Attorney General, Charles L. Moore, dismissed for want of prosecution, with directions to the district court of Pottawatomie county to enfore/ die judgment and sentence.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

Cited by 0 cases

No case in this database cites this case.

Authorities cited 0

No citations to other opinions in this database were found.

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list