TaiLexi AI U.S. Case Law

Schriber v. Buckner

John Schriber v. C. R. Buckner

Schriber v. Buckner, 1907 OK 41, 90 P. 10
Download
Format
Include

Star paging (*137) is kept for pin cites.

Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · State Highest Courts
Decided
February 14, 1907
Judges
Burford
Citations
90 P. 101907 OK 4118 Okla. 2981907 Okla. LEXIS 114
Syllabus
APPEAL AND ERROR—Case Made. On the authority of Sawyer Lumber Company v. Champlin Lumber Company, 16 Okla., 90 Held: That the record contains no sufficient averment that the case contained all the evidence introduced on the trial. (Syllabus by the Court.)
Summary
Error from the District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.

Opinion of the Court — Burford

Opinion of the court by Burford, C. J.:

This cause is presented by petition in error and case made duty authenticated.

The defendant in error upon a trial before a jury recovered a verdict and judgment for $145.00 and costs for serr vices as attorney for the plaintiff in error. The only errors relied upon are the lack of evidence to warrant the verdict, and the incorrectness of certain instructions. Neither of these propositions can he correctly determined without an examination of the evidence introduced on the trial. The ease made contains no recital or averment that it contains *299 all the evidence submitted on the trial of the cause. In the absence of such recital there is nothing for us to consider.

Sawyer Lumber Co. v. Champlin Lumber Co., 16 Okla. 90 , and cases cited.

Attached to the case is the following statement, signed by counsel for defendant, to wit :

“'The above and foregoing case made in the case of C. R. Buckner v. John Schriber, Sr., contains a full, true and correct copy and statement of all the pleadings, motions, judgments, entries and orders of court made in said cause, together with all the evidence. and all the objections and exceptions made by either party to the orders or rulings of the court, and all the objections and exceptions made in said cause."

This statement does not supply the place of the averment required, that the case does contain all the evidence introduced on the trial of the cause.

The judgment of the district court of Garfield county is affirmed, at the costs of the plaintiff in error.

All the Justices concurring.

How later courts describe this case

No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.

1909: 21914: 119092026peak 1909 · 2

Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.

Authorities cited 1

DepthCaseCited by
Sawyer & Austin Lumber Co. v. Champlain Lumber Co., 1905 OK 112, 84 P. 1093 19

Keyboard shortcuts

/Focus the search box
j kNext / previous result
EnterOpen the selected result
xAdd / remove the selected result from the download list
n pNext / previous search term in a case
cCopy the citation of the current case
+ −Larger / smaller reading text
?Show this list