Canfield v. Bell
CANFIELD Et Al. v. BELL Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
*623 HARDY, J.
This case comes on upon motion to dismiss appeal, because: (1) The case-made was not filed in the court below; (2) the certificate of the judge who tried the case was never attested by the clerk of the county court; and (3) the certificate of the alleged case-made does not affirmatively show that it contains a full, true, and correct transcript of the record in said cause.
It does not appear that the case-made was ever filed in the office of the clerk of the trial court, as required by section 5242, Rev. Laws 1910, and, in the absence of a request for leave to withdraw case-made and file same as required by said statute, it will be stricken from the files of this court; and, not being properly certified as a transcript, the petition in error is dismissed.
Abbott .v Rogers, 35 Okla. 189 , 128 Pac. 908 ;
Peck v. Stephens, 35 Okla. 468 , 130 Pac. 276 ;
Montemat v. Johnson, 42 Okla. 443 , 141 Pac. 779 .
All the Justices concur.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 3 cases
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.