Colter v. Martin
COLTER Et Al. v. MARTIN Et Al.
Syllabus
Summary
Syllabus and headnotes are prepared by the reporter or publisher, not the court, and are not part of the opinion.
Opinion of the Court
Opinion by DAY, O.
Defendants in error filed their supplemental motion to dismiss appeal in this cause on May 24, 1916, service of which was duly acknowledged by attorneys for plaintiffs in error. It appears that no response has been filed to this motion.
The ground set out in the motion is: That the ease-made fails to show the same was signed, settled, and served within the time-provided by law or within any valid and lawful extension thereof.
The case-made discloses that the order-extending the time in which to make, serve, and settle same was made on the 5th day of February, 1915, -and that said case-made was finally settled on the 3d day of March of the-same year.
The case-made fails to affirmatively show that the order extending the time within which to make and serve said appeal was entered in the journals of the court pursuant to section 5317 or section 5324, Rev. Laws-1910.
This court is therefore without jurisdiction of this appeal. Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Miller, 53 Okla. 149 , 155 Pac. 864 .
It therefore follows -that the motion to-dismiss should be sustained.
By the Court: It is so ordered.
How later courts describe this case
No later court has written an explanatory parenthetical about this case yet.
Cited by 1 case
View all citing references →Relies on it most ⓘ
Most recent
Citing references are not a citator: they show that a later opinion cites this case, not whether it followed, distinguished, or overruled it. Check negative history before relying on this case.